![]() ![]() I found, over time though, I became reasonably good - was a good team player and ended up with a decent k/d ratio. ![]() For weeks I was absolutely useless to my team and lacked understanding of the game, even to the point of not knowing you were supposed to follow squad leader orders and other daft things. I came to absolutely love battlefield 1, although, the learning curve was massive. I am not a huge gamer, probs put 5-6 hours a week in to playing. It’s a question I’ve been asking myself leading me to search and find this post! Bfv has those moments again with a nice slice of difficulty that makes it more intense. It didnt have those only in bf moments i treasure since i played bf1942. As for is one is better then the other well thats subjective at best, personally i enjoyed bf1 but i found it very ok, as i said before the gravitas was done very well but the multiplayer wasnt memorable for me. How ever if anyone thinks bfv is a reskin of bf1 is high and completely ignorant of game developement. Battlefield 5 vs battlefield 1 plus#Plus the way they portrayed it and its gravitas was done supremely well. ![]() You have to rememver bf1 came about when people were asking for old world war shooters in a wave of futuristic games. Then the elephant in the room bf1 vs bfv. I mean BF in itself does lend to the genre i will admit, but im waiting for more info. Firstly anyone comparing CoD and Bf as similar are the same people who compare rugby and football because they both involve balls and teams.Īs for battle royal, it is a little bandwagon jumping by dice but as we know very little its hard to critise other then using resources that could be better spent elsewhere. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |